Both monitor user flows. One uses API-level monitoring, one uses browser automation. Here's everything you need to know.
14-day free trial • No credit card required
Two philosophies for the same goal
Code-First Approach
const { test } = require('@playwright/test');
test('checkout flow', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('https://shop.com');
await page.click('[data-test="add-to-cart"]');
await page.fill('#email', 'test@test.com');
await page.fill('#card', '4242424242424242');
await page.click('button[type="submit"]');
await page.waitForSelector('.success');
// ... 50 more lines
});
Write Playwright scripts, version control them, run in CI/CD
API-Based Approach
Step 1: POST /api/login
Body: { email, password }
Extract: auth_token from response
Step 2: POST /api/cart/add
Headers: Authorization: Bearer {auth_token}
Body: { product_id: 123 }
Extract: cart_id from response
Step 3: POST /api/checkout
Headers: Authorization: Bearer {auth_token}
Body: { cart_id: {cart_id} }
Assert: status === "success"
Configure HTTP requests, extract values, chain steps together
Side-by-side breakdown
| Feature | PerkyDash | Checkly |
|---|---|---|
| Setup & Approach | ||
| Flow monitoring approach | API-based | Browser-based |
| Technical knowledge required | Yes (API config) | Yes (Playwright) |
| Best for | API/backend flows | UI/frontend flows |
| Monitoring Types | ||
| Process/flow monitoring | ✅ | ✅ |
| Uptime monitoring | ✅ | ✅ |
| API monitoring | ✅ | ✅ |
| Visual diff monitoring | ✅ | ❌ |
| SSL monitoring | ✅ | ❌ |
| Heartbeat/cron monitoring | ✅ | ✅ |
| Status Pages | ||
| Built-in status pages | ✅ | ✅ |
| Emergency status page tool | ✅ | ❌ |
| Pricing | ||
| Starting price | €9.99/mo | $0 (limited) |
| Pro equivalent | €9.99/mo | $24/mo |
| Team/Agency | €39.99/mo | $64/mo |
| Pricing model | Flat | Per-check runs |
| Browser check runs | Unlimited | Limited by plan |
| Advanced | ||
| CI/CD integration | Basic | Advanced |
| Monitoring as code | ❌ | ✅ |
| Private locations | ❌ | ✅ |
| Playwright scripting | ❌ | ✅ |
| Best For | ||
| API/backend testing | ✅ | ⚠️ |
| Browser UI testing | ❌ | ✅ |
| Flat pricing needs | ✅ | ❌ |
| CI/CD integration | Basic | Advanced |
Understanding the cost models
Pro: €9.99/mo
Agency: €39.99/mo
No surprises. No overage charges. Pay one price, check as often as needed.
Free Tier
Starter: $24/mo
Team: $64/mo
Usage-based. Need more checks? Pay for additional runs.
If you run checks frequently (every 5 minutes across multiple flows), Checkly costs can add up with overage charges. PerkyDash flat pricing means predictable bills — no surprises at month-end.
Real scenarios, honest recommendations
"I'm a solo founder with an e-commerce site"
Winner: PerkyDash
API-based monitoring, flat pricing, status pages included. Perfect if your checkout is API-driven. Choose Checkly if you need to test actual UI clicks and forms.
"I'm a developer who wants monitoring in my GitHub workflow"
Winner: Checkly
Monitoring-as-code, Playwright native, CI/CD integration. Version control your checks alongside your code.
"I run an agency managing 20+ client sites"
Winner: PerkyDash
Flat pricing across all clients. White-label status pages included. Client views for easy reporting. Lower total cost for managing multiple sites.
"I'm a DevOps engineer at a startup"
Winner: Depends
Checkly if you need browser-based testing and CI/CD integration. PerkyDash if you want API monitoring with flat pricing and included status pages.
Being honest about trade-offs
Checkly's Playwright integration lets you test actual browser interactions - clicks, forms, JavaScript execution. If you need to verify UI behavior rather than just API responses, Checkly is the right choice.
If your team uses CI/CD pipelines and infrastructure-as-code, Checkly fits naturally. Version control your monitors, run them in pull requests, and manage everything from your repo.
Need to monitor internal services behind a firewall? Checkly offers private locations. PerkyDash currently only supports public-facing sites.
Complex authentication flows, dynamic data extraction, custom assertions — if you need this level of control, Checkly's scripting gives you that power.
Bottom line: If you need to test actual browser UI interactions or want monitoring-as-code, Checkly is excellent. If you need API-level monitoring with flat pricing and included status pages, choose PerkyDash.
If you've realized browser-based testing is overkill for your API monitoring needs, PerkyDash offers a simpler approach with flat pricing and included status pages. Configure your API-based flows and get predictable costs.
Start Free TrialCommon questions about the comparison
Try PerkyDash free for 14 days. Configure your API flows and get predictable costs. No credit card required.
14-day free trial • No credit card • Cancel anytime